Tuesday, 28 February 2017

Fillum review: Hidden Figures

I’ve been very impatient to see Hidden Figures and so I recently went to my first ever Cineworld Unlimited screening. I’m a big fan of Janelle Monae and have been really looking forward to seeing if acting is something she excels at as well (spoiler: yep!).

20th Century Fox

Hidden Figures focuses on three black American women in the 1960s who work for NASA as computers (people who compute – yeah, that’s where that word came from!). The three main characters are based on real life women - Katherine Goble (Taraji P. Henson), Dorothy Vaughan (Octavia Spencer), & Mary Jackson (Janelle Monae) - who are working at the height of the “Space Race” between the USA & the Soviet Union.

There was a lot more laughter than I expected, with each of the leads feeling very familiar and identifiable, and quite modern in their attitudes to their own personal success and self-worth. Though on the outside the issues they encounter could broadly be put down to racism (and sexism), I really enjoyed the portrayal of three very different women, each fighting their own separate battle in their own individual way.

Though based on true experiences of the three women, the story is definitely dramatised, with timelines being shifted in order to provide all three leads with satisfying arcs which did not, in real life, take place at the same time.  In the cursory reading that I have done since seeing the film, the women in real life seem even more impressive than their fictional counterparts, so the changes made in the film are not exaggerating anything that the women did not actually achieve. I feel like there is still more story to be told about all three of these women, so it makes sense to condense some of their biggest achievements into the space of one film.

Something I liked less about the film was the attempt to make the white characters “redeemable”; without going into detail, I didn’t think it was necessary (or, let’s be honest, realistic) to have some of the white characters, such as Katherine’s & Dorothy’s bosses (Michael Keaton & Kirsten Dunst, respectively), be redeemed by their actions as soon as they suddenly realise that the women they work with are actual humans. Excuses are often made that these “white saviour” elements are added to ~challenging stories so that white people don’t feel maligned by the portrayal of the people they can most easily identify with. I can understand why it might be difficult for Joe Public to identify with NASA mathematicians, but the white characters are no more socially or intellectually accessible, and I think it is a cop out to imply that all of the women’s obstacles are removed once their white colleagues are made aware of the struggles that they face. In media, it’s frustrating that people of colour seem to have to exist in relation to white people, when their full stories can be told without an allied white person in sight.

20th Century Fox

In my own cinema experience, I found it jarring and disheartening that, while there were many moments intended to illicit laughter, the audience in my screening also laughed at the “separate but equal” coffee pot set out for one of the main characters when she is the only black woman in an office full of white men. I understand that laughter can mask or imply discomfort, but it also made me consider that some people really may not have sat with and absorbed the realities of that time, and therefore it may be more difficult for them to see the remnants of this discrimination in present day.

On a lighter note, Pharrell’s soundtrack had me bouncing in my seat (the song over the end credits is especially striking), the clothing in the film was beautiful and I covet it all, and Mahershala Ali is very, very easy on the eyes (and ears).

I would highly encourage everyone to see Hidden Figures – a PG film about smart women empowering themselves. It has been out in cinemas since 17 February 2017, and if you’re interested in preview screenings like the one I went to, you can sign up to Cineworld Unlimited using my Recommend a Friend code, and we both get a free month paid subscription, worth over €20. That code is RAF-70EL-68QZ-16WK-03XG.

Are you looking forward to Hidden Figures? What other films are you looking forward to over the next few months? Moonlight & Prevenge are both next on my list!

Monday, 27 February 2017

Netflix recommendation: Ethical clothing & The True Cost

I've recently started to think about where my clothes come from.

I've never been mad into clothes, I wouldn't really know anything about the latest trends unless by osmosis from my guilty pleasure interest in celebrity gossip, and I definitely couldn't be bothered to try them. There could be times where I had had a particularly difficult week in work, and in order to get pumped for the weekend ahead, I might look for a new dress or skirt or top. As a self-confessed cheapo, I would look in the usual places of Penneys (Primark), H&M, New Look, Forever 21, Bershka, etc. I figured, if I chose something especially outlandish or 'on-trend' and never wore it again, or if it was one of those materials that probably wouldn't survive the wash, well, it didn't exactly break the bank. I would look at people who seemed chained to brands, and feel secretly (and sometimes not so secretly) smug that I had paid as much for my whole outfit as they had for their t-shirt. As someone who hasn't really changed in size since my late teens, I still have clothes from 10 years ago that I could easily slip into tomorrow (though my clothing tastes are less technicolour these days), so when I finally do decide to do a clear out for the charity shops, there is a lot to go through and feel charitable about. If I got use out of them once or twice, and then send them to charity shops, it's basically a win/win, right?

I found The True Cost, a documentary on Netflix, to be eye opening in a way that it shouldn't be. That is, we should all really know this stuff already. Maybe other people do, and I've been sitting in my bubble, blissfully ignorant to the significance of my Friday evening clothing purchase. I would recommend watching the documentary because it will explain and present everything in a much more cohesive way, but I wanted to discuss the important bits that I took from it. I had heard, as I assume everyone has, of the terrible conditions that people work in when manufacturing clothes, poor wages, long hours, and lack of job security. I had even vaguely heard of a building collapse which killed many workers, which may have been connected to Penneys (Primark). I hadn't looked into any of this and, to be completely honest, I'm embarrassed to say that I assumed there had to be some part of the story that was not being reported on, because surely it couldn't be the fault of anyone for a building to collapse so suddenly? Surely it couldn't have been foreseen or preventable?

It turns out there were many things that I had never considered, such as the right to unionise, the effect that such low wages and long hours would have on single parents, and the toxic materials that factory workers encounter, as well as the effect that the disposal or treatment of these materials would have on the local population.

Henry Street/myhome.ie

The main thing I took away from The True Cost, however, was how I never considered what happens to those clothes that I send to charity shops when they've done their job for me, or what happens to the clothes that are not sold when there is a new collection (which often seems weekly). Have you ever wondered how, in old films, people seem to fit everything they need in such a small suitcase? Not so long ago, you would buy clothes to last, even getting them made to measure, and would only change with the change of seasons. You take things in or let them out if your size changed, and this would often be done by a local business, and you would mend them if they broke. In such a short space of time, we have evolved into an era of "fast fashion", which demands the latest fashion at the lowest prices, with quality and longevity being almost irrelevant. (I would sometimes want my clothes to rip or dye in the wash, so that I felt I had an excuse to buy more.) It's difficult to know who started the "fast fashion" movement, but there is now an unhealthy co-dependent relationship between the consumer and the fashion companies, where the consumer feels the need to update their look every month, and each retailer feels the pressure to continually churn out new collections at a low price in order to remain competitive. Would you be as likely to pop into Penneys every week if you knew they'd have exactly the same stock as the previous three months? So many retailers rely on casual purchases, where you might even be browsing with a friend, or using it as a meeting point, and still you'll come out having bought something, because why not? Well, that top that you bought and never wore and gave to the charity shop actually couldn't be sold, and was shipped to Africa, where they couldn't sell it either so now it's in their landfill.

I think we have a responsibility as consumers to make more informed decisions. Personally speaking, I am now aiming to not purchase any clothing at all. Any clothing I do purchase (either for a specific occasion or essential items that need to be replaced) I hope to source from an ethical company, and I will aim for it to be sustainable so that it does not need to be replaced again anytime soon. I learned, from a big move a few years ago, that living out of boxes and having only a few skirts, dresses, tops, and hoodies to rotate every week is not a bad thing. In fact, it's actually freeing to not have as many options and, if everything matches, there are still endless combinations to choose from. Going forward with this blog, I hope to enlist the guidance of some fashionable readers with making the most of the clothes that own, and wearing clothing combinations suggested by you that I might not have otherwise considered.

I would advise anyone and everyone to watch The True Cost, because clothing is something that we all have in common. If you're someone who only buys from Dunnes, or M&S, or pay far more money for your clothes that I would have -- you are not excluded. The higher price tag does not mean that the manufacturing is any more ethical than any other retailer. I'm not asking any action from anyone, other than to learn about the decisions you are making. We have a responsibility to make informed decisions, and if you watch The True Cost and still decide to make the same purchasing choices, at least you are doing it with your eyes fully open.

I'd love to hear your thoughts. Are you already aware of "fast fashion" and the corresponding ethical, sustainable clothing movement? Have you seen The True Cost and had a different take?